Lippa v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lippa v. New York State Division of Parole

202 A.D.2d 928, 610 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3089

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 928 (Lippa v. New York State Division of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lippa v. New York State Division of Parole, 202 A.D.2d 928, 610 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3089 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Keegan, J.), entered June 2, 1993 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for parole.

Respondent’s decision to deny petitioner parole based upon the seriousness of his crime and his poor institutional record is supported by the record and satisfied the requirements of Executive Law § 259-i and Correction Law § 805. Supreme Court was therefore correct in dismissing the petition.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Keegan, J.), entered June 2, 1993 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for parole.

Respondent’s decision to deny petitioner parole based upon the seriousness of his crime and his poor institutional record is supported by the record and satisfied the requirements of Executive Law § 259-i and Correction Law § 805. Supreme Court was therefore correct in dismissing the petition.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 928, 610 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lippa-v-new-york-state-division-of-parole-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack