Lippa v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lippa v. New York State Division of Parole

202 A.D.2d 928, 610 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3089

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 1994·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Keegan, J.), entered June 2, 1993 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for parole.

Respondent’s decision to deny petitioner parole based upon the seriousness of his crime and his poor institutional record is supported by the record and satisfied the requirements of Executive Law § 259-i and Correction Law § 805. Supreme Court was therefore correct in dismissing the petition.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Keegan, J.), entered June 2, 1993 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s request for parole.

Respondent’s decision to deny petitioner parole based upon the seriousness of his crime and his poor institutional record is supported by the record and satisfied the requirements of Executive Law § 259-i and Correction Law § 805. Supreme Court was therefore correct in dismissing the petition.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Lippa v. New York State Division of Parole, 202 A.D.2d 928, 610 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3089 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

202 A.D.2d 928 (Lippa v. New York State Division of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related