Lipman v. Delaware River Ferry Co.

107 A. 219, 263 Pa. 584, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 482
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 17, 1919
DocketAppeal, No. 108
StatusPublished

This text of 107 A. 219 (Lipman v. Delaware River Ferry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lipman v. Delaware River Ferry Co., 107 A. 219, 263 Pa. 584, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 482 (Pa. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This case was clearly for the jury, and this is all that need be said in dismissing the third and fourth assign[586]*586ments. They allege error in the refusal of the court to direct a verdict for the defendant, and in the dismissal of its motion for judgment n. o. v. Nothing appears in the brief of counsel for appellant in support of the first, and the second merely complains of the refusal to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 A. 219, 263 Pa. 584, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipman-v-delaware-river-ferry-co-pa-1919.