Lipkis v. Pikus

476 N.E.2d 331, 64 N.Y.2d 830, 486 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17606
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The only issue presented by the question certified was whether the Appellate Division had the power to grant the relief given to petitioner by that court. The Appellate Division had the power. We pass on no other issue. Question certified answered in the affirmative (see, Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, 63 NY2d 1031; Serenity Homes v Town Bd., 37 NY2d 841).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lipkis v. Pikus, 476 N.E.2d 331, 64 N.Y.2d 830, 486 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17606 (N.Y. 1985).

476 N.E.2d 331 (Lipkis v. Pikus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Metzger v. Metzger
133 A.D.2d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)