Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.

444 S.E.2d 417, 212 Ga. App. 814, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1454, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 374

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 1, 1994

DocketA92A1906

StatusPublished

This text of 444 S.E.2d 417 (Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., 444 S.E.2d 417, 212 Ga. App. 814, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1454, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 374 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

The Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the holding of this court in Lipham v. Federated Dept. Stores, 208 Ga. App. 385 (430 SE2d 590), which case affirmed the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment to appellee Federated Department Stores, Inc., and concluded that the grant of summary judgment was improper, as to whether Rich’s employee Heal acted with ordinary care was a question for jury resolution. Therefore, this must be reversed and remanded for compliance with the holding of the Supreme Court.

Judgment reversed and remanded with direction.

Pope, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Beasley, P. J., Cooper, Andrews, Johnson, Blackburn and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

The Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the holding of this court in Lipham v. Federated Dept. Stores, 208 Ga. App. 385 (430 SE2d 590), which case affirmed the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment to appellee Federated Department Stores, Inc., and concluded that the grant of summary judgment was improper, as to whether Rich’s employee Heal acted with ordinary care was a question for jury resolution. Therefore, this must be reversed and remanded for compliance with the holding of the Supreme Court.

Judgment reversed and remanded with direction.

Pope, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Beasley, P. J., Cooper, Andrews, Johnson, Blackburn and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 S.E.2d 417, 212 Ga. App. 814, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1454, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipham-v-federated-department-stores-inc-gactapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack