Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.

Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.

444 S.E.2d 417, 212 Ga. App. 814, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1454, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 374
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 Ga. App. 385 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 1, 1994·No. A92A1906·Published

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

The Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the holding of this court in Lipham v. Federated Dept. Stores, 208 Ga. App. 385 (430 SE2d 590), which case affirmed the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment to appellee Federated Department Stores, Inc., and concluded that the grant of summary judgment was improper, as to whether Rich’s employee Heal acted with ordinary care was a question for jury resolution. Therefore, this must be reversed and remanded for compliance with the holding of the Supreme Court.

Judgment reversed and remanded with direction.

Pope, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Beasley, P. J., Cooper, Andrews, Johnson, Blackburn and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., 444 S.E.2d 417, 212 Ga. App. 814, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1454, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 374 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

444 S.E.2d 417 (Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.
430 S.E.2d 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)