Lipford v. Corrigan

849 N.E.2d 43, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1499
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 2006·No. 2006-1019·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion to expedite and for emergency review and motion for stay of proceedings in lower court and to advance matter on the court’s docket,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions are denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lipford v. Corrigan, 849 N.E.2d 43, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1499 (Ohio 2006).

849 N.E.2d 43 (Lipford v. Corrigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.