Lipford v. Corrigan
849 N.E.2d 43, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1499
This text of 849 N.E.2d 43 (Lipford v. Corrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lipford v. Corrigan, 849 N.E.2d 43, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1499 (Ohio 2006).
Opinion
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion to expedite and for emergency review and motion for stay of proceedings in lower court and to advance matter on the court’s docket,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
849 N.E.2d 43, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipford-v-corrigan-ohio-2006.