Lipcon v. Guardianship of Diaz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lipcon v. Guardianship of Diaz

556 So. 2d 1125, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2584, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6126, 1989 WL 133290

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 7, 1989

DocketNo. 89-612

StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 1125 (Lipcon v. Guardianship of Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lipcon v. Guardianship of Diaz, 556 So. 2d 1125, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2584, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6126, 1989 WL 133290 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals an order refusing to permit him to withdraw as counsel of record for a minor plaintiff and an order entering a money judgment against him for costs sustained by the minor plaintiff’s estate without notice or an opportunity to be heard.

We find no error in the order denying the motion to withdraw as counsel, it appearing from the record that the appellant has received an attorney fee of at least $120,000 for representation of the minor plaintiff. We do find error in the final judgment imposing money damages on the appellant for a failure of procedural due process. Hammett v. Hammett, 510 So.2d 632 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Falkner v. Amerifirst [1126]*1126Savings and Loan Association, 489 So.2d 758 (Fla.2d DCA 1986).

Therefore the order denying withdrawal is affirmed and the order awarding money damages is reversed for further proceedings in the trial court upon appropriate pleadings, with an opportunity of counsel to be heard.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI