Lipari v. NOVATION, LLC
This text of 309 S.W.3d 843 (Lipari v. NOVATION, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Samuel K. LIPARI, Appellant,
v.
NOVATION, LLC, et al., Respondents.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Samuel K. Lipari, Independence, MO, Appellant Acting Pro Se.
William E. Quirk, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent, Shughart, Thomson & Kilroy.
Mark A. Olthoff, Kansas City, MO, for Respondents, Piper, and Duff.
Michael Thompson, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent, Husch Blackwell Sanders.
Peter F. Daniel, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent, Lathrop & Gage.
Jay Heidrick, Overland Park, KS, for Respondents, Grundhofer, Cecere, and Davis.
John Power, Kansas City, MO, for Respondents, Novation, University, VHA, Spindler, Bezanson, Duncan, Oliverius, Trease, Robb, Terry, Cox Health, St. Luke, Stormont-Vail, Baker, GHX, Neoforma, Zollars, Nonomaque, and Volunteer Hosp.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., LISA WHITE HARDWICK, and CYNTHIA R. MARTIN, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Mr. Samuel K. Lipari appeals from trial court judgments granting motions to dismiss and a motion for judgment on the pleadings. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 S.W.3d 843, 2010 WL 768935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipari-v-novation-llc-moctapp-2010.