Liotard v. Spitzer

298 A.D.2d 438, 748 N.Y.S.2d 266, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9828

This text of 298 A.D.2d 438 (Liotard v. Spitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liotard v. Spitzer, 298 A.D.2d 438, 748 N.Y.S.2d 266, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Williams, J.H.O.), dated March 13, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against her dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the verdict is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Altman, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicastro v. Park
113 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 A.D.2d 438, 748 N.Y.S.2d 266, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liotard-v-spitzer-nyappdiv-2002.