Lionell Devonn Crossley v. State
This text of Lionell Devonn Crossley v. State (Lionell Devonn Crossley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Appellant's brief was due August 2, 2010. The brief has not been received and appellant's retained attorney, Craig A. Washington, did not respond to the Court's notice that the brief is overdue.
The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and, if he is not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned this appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter's notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than December 3, 2010. Rule 38.8(b)(3).
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton
Abated
Filed: November 2, 2010
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lionell Devonn Crossley v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lionell-devonn-crossley-v-state-texapp-2010.