Lionel Ernest Tholmer v. James Rowland

Ninth Circuit

Lionel Ernest Tholmer v. James Rowland

990 F.2d 1260, 1993 WL 94366

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 31, 1993

Docket91-16892

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 990 F.2d 1260 (Lionel Ernest Tholmer v. James Rowland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lionel Ernest Tholmer v. James Rowland, 990 F.2d 1260, 1993 WL 94366 (9th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

990 F.2d 1260

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Lionel Ernest THOLMER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
James ROWLAND, et. al., Respondents-Appellees

No. 91-16892.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 9, 1993.*
Decided March 31, 1993.

Before CHOY, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The district court order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the well-written, well-reasoned memorandum of Findings and Recommendations adopted by the District Court.

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI