Lionel Edwards v. American Railcar Industries

366 F. App'x 702
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2010
Docket09-1179
StatusUnpublished

This text of 366 F. App'x 702 (Lionel Edwards v. American Railcar Industries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lionel Edwards v. American Railcar Industries, 366 F. App'x 702 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lionel Edwards appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action. After reviewing the record de novo, in the light most favorable to Edwards, see Arnold v. Nursing & Rehab. Ctr. at Good Shepherd, LLC, 471 F.3d 843, 845 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. We also decline to consider Edwards’s new arguments on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ,

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 F. App'x 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lionel-edwards-v-american-railcar-industries-ca8-2010.