Home/Ninth Circuit/Lionel E. Gentry v. Ernie Roe, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

Lionel E. Gentry v. Ernie Roe, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

381 F.3d 1219, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18283
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lionel E. Gentry v. Ernie Roe, Warden Attorney General of the State of California. Read the opinion of the Court — 320 F.3d 891 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2004·No. 00-55691·Published

Opinion

381 F.3d 1219

Lionel E. GENTRY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Ernie ROE, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-55691.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 30, 2004.

James H. Locklin, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.

Shawn McGahey Webb, Deputy Attorney General of the State of California, Los Angeles, CA, for the respondents-appellees.

Before HUG, JR., FARRIS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Based upon the Supreme Court's decision in this case, filed October 20, 2003, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, and the mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lionel E. Gentry v. Ernie Roe, Warden Attorney General of the State of California, 381 F.3d 1219, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18283 (9th Cir. 2004).

381 F.3d 1219 (Lionel E. Gentry v. Ernie Roe, Warden Attorney General of the State of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.