Lionel Andrew Dominguez v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Lionel Andrew Dominguez v. United States

245 F.2d 284

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 25, 1957·No. 16401·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon admissible evidence which was sufficient to establish both the commission of the offenses and the intent and under proper instructions to which no exception was taken, the appellant was found guilty by a jury verdict of willfully failing to file income tax returns for 1952 and 1953. 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C. 1939) § 145(a); 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C. 1954) § 7203. Appeal is taken from the' judgment entered upon the verdict and the court’s refusal to grant judgments of acquittal is assigned as error. The record is free from prejudicial error and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon admissible evidence which was sufficient to establish both the commission of the offenses and the intent and under proper instructions to which no exception was taken, the appellant was found guilty by a jury verdict of willfully failing to file income tax returns for 1952 and 1953. 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C. 1939) § 145(a); 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C. 1954) § 7203. Appeal is taken from the' judgment entered upon the verdict and the court’s refusal to grant judgments of acquittal is assigned as error. The record is free from prejudicial error and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Lionel Andrew Dominguez v. United States, 245 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

245 F.2d 284 (Lionel Andrew Dominguez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related