Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works v. McGrath

Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works v. McGrath

54 A. 1124, 68 N.J.L. 731, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 215
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 19, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 54 A. 1124 (Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works v. McGrath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works v. McGrath, 54 A. 1124, 68 N.J.L. 731, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 215 (N.J. 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Dixon in his opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Swayze, VredenBURGH, VOORHEES, VROOM, GREEN. 11. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A. 1124, 68 N.J.L. 731, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liondale-bleach-dye-print-works-v-mcgrath-nj-1903.