Lion v. Wolf

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Lion v. Wolf

9 La. Ann. 65

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 15, 1854

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 La. Ann. 65 (Lion v. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lion v. Wolf, 9 La. Ann. 65 (La. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, J.

The defendants and appellees move for the dismissal of the appeal on the ground that the transcript was not filed within tho delay prescribed by law. The appeal was made returnable on the 4th Monday of January, 1854. The transcript was not filed until Friday, the 27th, more than three judicial days having elapsed, and no application having been made for further time, the appeal must be dismissed at appellant’s cost, which is decreed. C. P. 590, 883, 585 ; Pond v. Horton, 7 L. 176; New Orleans & Carrollton Railroad Co. v. Hood, 3 Ann. 226; McDowell & Peck, 5 Ann. 42; Bonnabel v. Walter, Ann. 744.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, J.

The defendants and appellees move for the dismissal of the appeal on the ground that the transcript was not filed within tho delay prescribed by law. The appeal was made returnable on the 4th Monday of January, 1854. The transcript was not filed until Friday, the 27th, more than three judicial days having elapsed, and no application having been made for further time, the appeal must be dismissed at appellant’s cost, which is decreed. C. P. 590, 883, 585 ; Pond v. Horton, 7 L. 176; New Orleans & Carrollton Railroad Co. v. Hood, 3 Ann. 226; McDowell & Peck, 5 Ann. 42; Bonnabel v. Walter, Ann. 744.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 La. Ann. 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lion-v-wolf-la-1854.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack