Linzer v. Weitzen
This text of 266 A.D. 748 (Linzer v. Weitzen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No opinion. Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Close, P. J., and Lewis, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment on the [749]*749law and to dismiss the complaint on the law, with the following memorandum: Plaintiff has recovered a judgment upon a claim discharged in bankruptcy based on the theory of an alleged subsequent promise in writing to pay. In our opinion the alleged promise in writing fails to meet the tests required to establish a present intention by the debtor to obligate himself or to undertake to pay. (Allen & Co. v. Ferguson, 85 U. S. 1; Herrington v. Davitt, 220 N. Y. 162; Lawrence v. Harrington, 122 N. Y. 408; Elwell v. Cumner, 136 Mass. 102; Gain v. Dunn, 243 App. Div. 849.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 A.D. 748, 41 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linzer-v-weitzen-nyappdiv-1943.