Linzer v. Weitzen

266 A.D. 748, 41 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4256

Opinion

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Close, P. J., and Lewis, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment on the [749] law and to dismiss the complaint on the law, with the following memorandum: Plaintiff has recovered a judgment upon a claim discharged in bankruptcy based on the theory of an alleged subsequent promise in writing to pay. In our opinion the alleged promise in writing fails to meet the tests required to establish a present intention by the debtor to obligate himself or to undertake to pay. (Allen & Co. v. Ferguson, 85 U. S. 1; Herrington v. Davitt, 220 N. Y. 162; Lawrence v. Harrington, 122 N. Y. 408; Elwell v. Cumner, 136 Mass. 102; Gain v. Dunn, 243 App. Div. 849.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linzer v. Weitzen, 266 A.D. 748, 41 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

266 A.D. 748 (Linzer v. Weitzen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen & Co. v. Ferguson
85 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1874)
Herrington v. . Davitt
115 N.E. 476 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Lawrence v. . Harrington
25 N.E. 406 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Gain v. Dunn
243 A.D. 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Elwell v. Cumner
136 Mass. 102 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)