Linzer v. Sebelius

Fourth Circuit

Linzer v. Sebelius

378 F. App'x 357

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 12, 2010·No. No. 09-2114·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Deborah S. Linzer appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Sebelius on Linzer’s Rehabilitation Act complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Linzer v. Sebelius, [358]*358No. 8:07-cv-00597-AW, 2009 WL 2778269 (D.Md. Aug. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Deborah S. Linzer appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Sebelius on Linzer’s Rehabilitation Act complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Linzer v. Sebelius, [358]*358No. 8:07-cv-00597-AW, 2009 WL 2778269 (D.Md. Aug. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Linzer v. Sebelius, 378 F. App'x 357 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

378 F. App'x 357 (Linzer v. Sebelius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.