Linville v. State
207 So. 3d 379, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19230
Opinion
The State properly concedes that Zachary N. Linville’s motion for return of personal property was legally sufficient. We agree and reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Bolden v. State, 875 So.2d 780, 782-83 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (noting that if motion for return of personal property is facially sufficient, trial court may order State to respond to motion or hold an evidentiary hearing).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Linville v. State, 207 So. 3d 379, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19230 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
207 So. 3d 379 (Linville v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bolden v. State
875 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)