Linville v. Escambia County

436 So. 2d 293, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20021
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 1983
DocketNo. AO-313
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 436 So. 2d 293 (Linville v. Escambia County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linville v. Escambia County, 436 So. 2d 293, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20021 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

SHIVERS, Judge.

Linville challenges the validity of Escam-bia County Ordinance No. 82-2, which pertains to the regulation and operation of bottle clubs, alleging that the ordinance was invalidly enacted and that the ordinance is constitutionally infirm on several grounds. We agree that the ordinance was invalidly enacted and, therefore, invalidate the ordinance and reverse the order of the trial court upholding the validity of the ordinance.

On review of the record, we find that no notice of intent to consider the challenged ordinance was on file, in a separate book, 15 days before the county commission acted on the ordinance, as required by Section 125.-66(2), Fla.Stat. (1981). On that basis, we declare the ordinance invalid. Since we decide this case on procedural grounds, we do not express any opinion on the constitutional issues presented here for review.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., and WIGGIN-TON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neumont v. Monroe County, Florida
242 F. Supp. 2d 1265 (S.D. Florida, 2002)
Redner v. State
47 Fla. Supp. 2d 76 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1991)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1989

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 So. 2d 293, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linville-v-escambia-county-fladistctapp-1983.