Lintz v. Grenard
This text of 5 A.D.2d 877 (Lintz v. Grenard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, the appeal is from an order denying leave to reargue appellant’s motion for change of venue. Appeal dismissed, with $10 eosts and disbursements. An order denying leave to reargue is not appealable, and no new or additional facts were presented in the affidavits submitted in support of the motion for leave to reargue; accordingly, there is no basis for treating the motion as a motion for leave to renew on additional papers (McNees v. Scholoff, 2 A D 2d 820).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.D.2d 877, 172 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lintz-v-grenard-nyappdiv-1958.