Linton v. Sharpsburg Bridge Co.

1 Grant 414, 1856 Pa. LEXIS 253
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 27, 1856·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The opinion was delivered

Per Curiam.

— This cause was properly disposed of by the District Court. Where the law authorizes a road to be made, it authorizes the taking of the land needed for the purpose, though it should not expressly say so. And just as certainly, if not so plainly, where it authorizes the erection of a bridge, it authorizes the taking of land for its abutments, when compensation is also provided for, even though it be contained in no express terms. The necessary incidents of an authority expressly granted need not be themselves expressed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linton v. Sharpsburg Bridge Co., 1 Grant 414, 1856 Pa. LEXIS 253 (Pa. 1856).

1 Grant 414 (Linton v. Sharpsburg Bridge Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mundis v. Southeastern Joint School District
72 Pa. D. & C. 612 (York County Court of Common Pleas, 1949)
Schmidt Et Ux. v. Allegheny Co.
154 A. 803 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Erie R. R. v. Public Service Commission
114 A. 357 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Cleveland & Pittsburg Railroad v. Speer
56 Pa. 325 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1868)
McKeen v. Delaware Division Canal Co.
49 Pa. 424 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1865)