Linton v. Hichborn

126 Mass. 30, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 160
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 29, 1878
StatusPublished

This text of 126 Mass. 30 (Linton v. Hichborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linton v. Hichborn, 126 Mass. 30, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 160 (Mass. 1878).

Opinion

By the Court.

This court cannot revise the finding in matter of fact of the judge by whom the case was tried with out a jury. The bill of exceptions fails to show that the judge [32]*32made any ruling in matter of law, beyond declining to rule that the facts which the evidence tended to prove did not constitute in law such a breach of the contract, on the part of the vendor, as would release the purchaser from his obligations, and entitle him to recover back the part of the purchase money already paid; and does not disclose the nature and degree of the injuries to the property with sufficient fulness and distinctness to enable this court to determine that the refusal so to rule was erroneous.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 Mass. 30, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linton-v-hichborn-mass-1878.