Linton v. Heye

Supreme Court

Linton v. Heye

194 U.S. 628, 24 S. Ct. 856, 48 L. Ed. 1157, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 653

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 11, 1904·No. No. 508·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted March 21,1904. Decided April 11, 1904. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Campbell v. Holt, 115 U. S. 620; Richardson v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, 169 U. S. 128; Giles v. Little, 134 U. S. 645. See Lantry v. Wolff, 49 Nebraska, 374; Murphy v. Evans Steam Laundry Company, 52 Nebraska, 593; Linton v. Heye, 95 N. W. Rep. 1040. Mr. John C. Watson and Mr. John V. Morgan in support of motions. Mr. Joseph H. Blair opposing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted March 21,1904. Decided April 11, 1904. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Campbell v. Holt, 115 U. S. 620; Richardson v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, 169 U. S. 128; Giles v. Little, 134 U. S. 645. See Lantry v. Wolff, 49 Nebraska, 374; Murphy v. Evans Steam Laundry Company, 52 Nebraska, 593; Linton v. Heye, 95 N. W. Rep. 1040. Mr. John C. Watson and Mr. John V. Morgan in support of motions. Mr. Joseph H. Blair opposing.

Linton v. Heye, 194 U.S. 628, 24 S. Ct. 856, 48 L. Ed. 1157, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 653 (1904).

Pincite

194 U.S. 628 (Linton v. Heye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related