Linton v. Frazier
29 Kan. 20
Opinion
This proceeding is pending before us upon what purports to be a bill of exceptions and also a case-made. Neither is certified, nor attested, as required by statute. The record is also otherwise irregular and defective, and it is therefore impossible for us to consider and determine the various questions sought to be presented concerning the alleged errors of the trial court. (Karr v. Hudson, 19 Kas. 474.)
The judgment of the district court must therefore be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Linton v. Frazier, 29 Kan. 20 (kan 1882).
29 Kan. 20 (Linton v. Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Limerick v. Gwinn
44 Kan. 694 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1890)