Linton v. Frazier

Supreme Court of Kansas

Linton v. Frazier

29 Kan. 20

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJuly 15, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 Kan. 20 (Linton v. Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linton v. Frazier, 29 Kan. 20 (kan 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This proceeding is pending before us upon what purports to be a bill of exceptions and also a case-made. Neither is certified, nor attested, as required by statute. The record is also otherwise irregular and defective, and it is therefore impossible for us to consider and determine the various questions sought to be presented concerning the alleged errors of the trial court. (Karr v. Hudson, 19 Kas. 474.)

The judgment of the district court must therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This proceeding is pending before us upon what purports to be a bill of exceptions and also a case-made. Neither is certified, nor attested, as required by statute. The record is also otherwise irregular and defective, and it is therefore impossible for us to consider and determine the various questions sought to be presented concerning the alleged errors of the trial court. (Karr v. Hudson, 19 Kas. 474.)

The judgment of the district court must therefore be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Kan. 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linton-v-frazier-kan-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack