Linthecum v. State

211 S.W. 456, 85 Tex. Crim. 247, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 183
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 23, 1919
DocketNo. 5372.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 S.W. 456 (Linthecum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linthecum v. State, 211 S.W. 456, 85 Tex. Crim. 247, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 183 (Tex. 1919).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In this case the record is before us without any bill of exceptions or any statement of facts. We find in the record a special charge réquesting the court to peremptorily *248 instruct the jury to return a verdict of not guilty. In the absence of a statement of facts we cannot tell whether the action of the court was correct or not, but our presumption necessarily is that it was!

There are various assignments in the motion for new trial but we cannot review same in the absence of such statement.

No errors being apparent the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flores v. State
227 S.W. 320 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 S.W. 456, 85 Tex. Crim. 247, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linthecum-v-state-texcrimapp-1919.