Lintern v. Lintern

58 Misc. 2d 335, 296 N.Y.S.2d 5
CourtNew York County Courts
DecidedDecember 13, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 Misc. 2d 335 (Lintern v. Lintern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lintern v. Lintern, 58 Misc. 2d 335, 296 N.Y.S.2d 5 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1968).

Opinion

Albert Orenstein, J.

Defendant has brought a motion before this court to vacate and set aside a judgment entered against him in City Court of the City of Syracuse on or about July 12,1968. A transcript of the said judgment was thereafter docketed in the County Clerk’s office of the County of Onondaga.

His proceeding is in the nature of a motion to open a default judgment and to stay the enforcement thereof by the Sheriff of Onondaga County.

The docketing of the transcript of the judgment rendered in City Court in the County Clerk’s office provides an aid to enforce the judgment but does not give this court jurisdiction to consider this application.

CPLR 5015 (subd. [a]) clearly requires that an application of this nature must be made in the court which rendered the judgment, viz: the City Court of the City of Syracuse. (See Brenner v. Arterial Plaza, 29 A D 2d 815.)

The motion is, therefore, denied without prejudice to an application for the same relief in the City Court of Syracuse.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neshewat v. Salem
365 F. Supp. 2d 508 (S.D. New York, 2005)
Voccola v. Shilling
88 Misc. 2d 103 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Misc. 2d 335, 296 N.Y.S.2d 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lintern-v-lintern-nycountyct-1968.