Linsley v. McCrackin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Linsley v. McCrackin

101 S.E. 919, 24 Ga. App. 641, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 422

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 6, 1920

Docket10504

StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 919 (Linsley v. McCrackin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linsley v. McCrackin, 101 S.E. 919, 24 Ga. App. 641, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 422 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

In this chse the issues raised by the pleadings and the evidence were fully and fairly submitted to the jury. The evidence, though in some respects conflicting, authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. Eor no reason assigned can we find error requiring a reversal of the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

In this chse the issues raised by the pleadings and the evidence were fully and fairly submitted to the jury. The evidence, though in some respects conflicting, authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. Eor no reason assigned can we find error requiring a reversal of the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 S.E. 919, 24 Ga. App. 641, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linsley-v-mccrackin-gactapp-1920.