Linsday v. Gillespie

Indiana Supreme Court

Linsday v. Gillespie

17 Ind. 219, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 366

DecidedDecember 4, 1861

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Ind. 219 (Linsday v. Gillespie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linsday v. Gillespie, 17 Ind. 219, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 366 (Ind. 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit on a note payable at bank, against the maker and indorser. The complaint alleged presentment for payment, non-payment and notice to the indorser. No copy of the protest and notice is set out in the complaint.

See Kohler v. Montgomery, post, p. 220. Judgment by default against the defendants, from which they appeal to this Court.

* The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Suit on a note payable at bank, against the maker and indorser. The complaint alleged presentment for payment, non-payment and notice to the indorser. No copy of the protest and notice is set out in the complaint.

See Kohler v. Montgomery, post, p. 220. Judgment by default against the defendants, from which they appeal to this Court.

* The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Ind. 219, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linsday-v-gillespie-ind-1861.