Linnider B & G Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Linnider B & G Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

52 A.D.2d 584, 382 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12171

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 584 (Linnider B & G Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linnider B & G Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 52 A.D.2d 584, 382 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12171 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations made by respondent, as follows: (1) the first dated January 22, 1976, and made after a hearing, cancelled petitioner’s special on-premises liquor license and (2) the second, made February 18, 1976, granted petitioner’s request for reconsideration of the penalty and, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior determination. Determinations confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. In our opinion, the determinations were neither arbitrary nor capricious. Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations made by respondent, as follows: (1) the first dated January 22, 1976, and made after a hearing, cancelled petitioner’s special on-premises liquor license and (2) the second, made February 18, 1976, granted petitioner’s request for reconsideration of the penalty and, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior determination. Determinations confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. In our opinion, the determinations were neither arbitrary nor capricious. Gulotta, P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 584, 382 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linnider-b-g-inc-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1976.