Linney v. . Mintz

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Linney v. . Mintz

78 S.E. 280, 162 N.C. 526, 1913 N.C. LEXIS 388

DecidedMay 7, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 78 S.E. 280 (Linney v. . Mintz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linney v. . Mintz, 78 S.E. 280, 162 N.C. 526, 1913 N.C. LEXIS 388 (N.C. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Held, this case presented only issues of fact, determined by the verdict. This was a special proceeding started before the Clerk of Alexander Superior Court to establish the boundary lines between the plaintiff and the defendants, and heard on appeal to the Superior Court upon the following issue: "Is the line from Black 4 to Black 5 the true dividing line between the plaintiff and the defendant."

We are of opinion that the question at issue is one of fact, and that it has been determined by the finding of the jury.

Upon a review of the record we find

No error. *Page 435

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Held, this case presented only issues of fact, determined by the verdict. This was a special proceeding started before the Clerk of Alexander Superior Court to establish the boundary lines between the plaintiff and the defendants, and heard on appeal to the Superior Court upon the following issue: "Is the line from Black 4 to Black 5 the true dividing line between the plaintiff and the defendant."

We are of opinion that the question at issue is one of fact, and that it has been determined by the finding of the jury.

Upon a review of the record we find

No error. *Page 435

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 S.E. 280, 162 N.C. 526, 1913 N.C. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linney-v-mintz-nc-1913.