Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Linnekogel v. Linnekogel

Linnekogel v. Linnekogel

122 A. 372, 95 N.J. Eq. 265, 10 Stock. 265, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 716
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 11, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 122 A. 372 (Linnekogel v. Linnekogel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linnekogel v. Linnekogel, 122 A. 372, 95 N.J. Eq. 265, 10 Stock. 265, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 716 (N.J. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bentley in the court of chancery.

For affirmance■—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—9. For reversal—Minturn, Kaliscii, Heppeniibimer—3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

W. v. W.
226 A.2d 860 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Loeb v. Loeb
215 A.2d 779 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Hill v. Hill
127 A. 584 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A. 372, 95 N.J. Eq. 265, 10 Stock. 265, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linnekogel-v-linnekogel-nj-1923.