Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Linnekogel v. Linnekogel

Linnekogel v. Linnekogel

122 A. 372, 95 N.J. Eq. 265, 10 Stock. 265, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 716
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 11, 1923·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bentley in the court of chancery.

For affirmance■—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—9. For reversal—Minturn, Kaliscii, Heppeniibimer—3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linnekogel v. Linnekogel, 122 A. 372, 95 N.J. Eq. 265, 10 Stock. 265, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 716 (N.J. 1923).

122 A. 372 (Linnekogel v. Linnekogel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. v. W.
226 A.2d 860 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Loeb v. Loeb
215 A.2d 779 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
Hill v. Hill
127 A. 584 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)