Linne v. Stout
This text of 46 N.W. 319 (Linne v. Stout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
All of defendants’ assignments of error rest entirely upon the assumption that it appeared from the pleadings that a judgment on the merits had 'been rendered in a former suit between the same parties for the same cause of action. That this assumption is erroneous is apparent from an inspection of the pleadings, because (1) the reply puts in issue the allegation of the answer that the former suit was for the same cause of action; (2) the judgment-roll, which is set out in the answer, shows affirmatively that, although both suits may have related to the same transaction or subject-matter, yet the causes of action were not the same.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 N.W. 319, 44 Minn. 110, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linne-v-stout-minn-1890.