Linnard's Appeal

3 A. 840, 2 Sadler 195, 21 Week. No. 40, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 630
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 5, 1886·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam: :

It is unquestioned that the certificate of the stock in question was transferred to the appellant in fraud of the rights of the appellees. The attempt, however, is to put the former on higher ground than that occupied by his vendor. The evidence shows no equities to produce that result.

[203]*203We therefore concur with the learned judge in bolding that fbe pledge under which the appellant claims is not such a purchase for value as to cure the defect in his title, or to preclude the appellees from reclaiming their stock on the ground of fraud in its transfer.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linnard's Appeal, 3 A. 840, 2 Sadler 195, 21 Week. No. 40, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 630 (Pa. 1886).

3 A. 840 (Linnard's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Albany National Bank v. Brown
114 N.E. 486 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1916)
Wails v. Farrington
1911 OK 59 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
King v. Mellon National Bank
75 A. 832 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Reed, Murdoch & Co. v. Brown Bros.
89 Iowa 454 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1893)
C. M. Henderson & Co. v. Gibbs & Allen
39 Kan. 679 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1888)