Linnan v. Berryhill
Opinion
Cyrus Safa Nevada Bar No: 13241 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-5491 E-mail rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Leonard Stone Attorney at Law: 5791 Shook & Stone, Chtd. 710 South 4th Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel.: (702) 385-2220 Fax: (702) 384-0394 E-mail: LMoreno@shookandstone.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Nicole Linnan
NICOLE LINNAN, ) Case No.: 3:19-cv-00225-LRH-WGC ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD ) AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY vs. ) FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT ) TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO ANDREW SAUL, ) JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) Commissioner of Social Security, ) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 ) U.S.C. § 1920 Defendant. ) ) AND ORDER THEREON ) TO THE HONORABLE LARRY R. HICKS, DISTRICT JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Nicole Linnan be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of three thousand eight hundred dollars ($3,800.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Nicole Linnan, the government will consider the matter of Nicole Linnan's assignment of EAJA fees to Cyrus Safa. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees shall be made payable to Nicole Linnan, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Nicole Linnan does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by Nicole Linnan.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Cyrus Safa.
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Nicole Linnan's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Nicole
1 The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury Linnan and/or Cyrus Safa including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Cyrus Safa and/or the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. } DATE: December 18, 2019 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Corus Safa BY: Cyrus Safa Attorney for plaintiff Nicole Linnan
|| DATE: December 18,2019 | NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH D United States Attorney /S/ Allison 9. Cheung Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) IT IS ORDERED . THE HONORA LARRY R. HICKS 71 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: December 23, 2019
SOCIAL SECURITY REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT This agreement was made on May 30, 2018, by and between the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohifing referred to as attorney and Ms. Nicole Lianan, $.5.N. : “$783, herein referred to as Claimant. 1. Claimant employs and appoints Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to represent Claimant as Ms. Nicole Linnan’s Attorneys at law in a Social Security claim regarding a claim for disability benefits and empowers Attorney to take such action as may be advisable in the judgment of Attorney, including the taking of judicial review. 2. In consideration of the services to be performed by the Attorney and jt being the desire of the Claimant te compensate Attorney out of the proceeds shall receive 25% of the backpay awarded by the Social Security Administration to the claimant or such amount as the Commissioner may designate under 42 U.S.C. § 406(a\(2)(A) which is currently $6,600.06, whichever is smaller, upon successful completion of the case at or before a first hearing decision Irom an ALJ. If the Claimant and the Attorney are unsuccessful in obtaining a recovery, Attorney will receive no fee. This matter is subject expedited fee approval except as stated in 93. 3. The provistons of ¥ 2 only apply to dispositions at or before a first hearing decision from an ALJ. The fee for successful prosecution of this matter is 25% of the backpay awarded upon reversal of any unfavorable ALJ decision for work before the Social Security Administration. Attorney shall petition for authorization to charge this fee in compliance with the Social Security Act for all time whether exclusively or not committed to such representation, 4. If this matter requires judicial review of any adverse decision of the Social Security Administration, the fee for successful prosecution of this matter is a separate 25% of the backpay awarded apon reversal of any unfavorable ALJ decision for work before the court. Attomey shall seek compensation under the Equal Access to Justice Act and such amount shall credit to the client for fees otherwise payable for that particular work. Client shall endorse such documents as are needed to pay Attorney any amounts under the EAJA and assigns such fee awards to Attorney. 5, Claimant shall pay ail costs, including, but nat limited to costs for medical reports, filing fees, and consultations and examinations by experts, in conection with the cause of action. 6, Attomey shall be entitled to a reasonable fee; notwithstanding the Claimant may discharge or obtain the substitution of attorneys before Attorney has completed the services for which he is hereby eroployed, and claimant grants a lien to Attomey for reasonable fees. 7, Attomey has made no warranties as to the successful termination of the cause of action, and alt expressions made by Attomey relative thereto are matters of Attorney’s opinion only. 8. This Agreement comprises the entire contract between Attorney and Claimant. The laws of the State of California shall govern the construction and interpretation of this Agreement except that federal law govems the approval of fees by the Commissioner or a federal court. Business and Professions Code § 6147({a}(4) states “that the fee is not set by law but is negotiable between attorney and client.” 9. Attorney agrees to perform all the services herein mentioned for the compensation provided above, 10. Client authorizes attorney to pay out of attorney fees and without cost to client eny and all referral or association fees to prior or referring attomeys or bar referral service. 1}. The receipt from Claimant of pone _ is hereby acknowledged by attomey to be placed in trust and used for costs, Itis so agreed. Ms- Nicole Linnan Law es of Lawrence D. Rohlfing You ho
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Linnan v. Berryhill (Linnan v. Berryhill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.