Linn v. Moore

Appellate Court of Illinois

Linn v. Moore

208 Ill. App. 524

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 16, 1917

DocketGen. No. 6,456

StatusPublished

This text of 208 Ill. App. 524 (Linn v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linn v. Moore, 208 Ill. App. 524 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Forcible entry and detainer, § 46*—what is effect of deed to redeeming creditor on right to bring. Where plaintiff in an action of forcible entry and detainer became owner of the premises by purchase and deed from a sheriff as a redemption creditor under his judgment obtained on the last day of the 15 months from the foreclosure sale from which he redeemed, a conveyance by the debtor on the same day to plaintiff did not prejudice plaintiff’s rights in such action under his deed from the sheriff. 3. Appeal and error, § 1488*—when admission of incompetent evidence in trial by court is harmless error. Where trial was before the court without a jury, and competent and uncontradicted evidence supported the finding and judgment, it was not material error if other evidence not technically competent was heard.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Forcible entry and detainer, § 46*—what is effect of deed to redeeming creditor on right to bring. Where plaintiff in an action of forcible entry and detainer became owner of the premises by purchase and deed from a sheriff as a redemption creditor under his judgment obtained on the last day of the 15 months from the foreclosure sale from which he redeemed, a conveyance by the debtor on the same day to plaintiff did not prejudice plaintiff’s rights in such action under his deed from the sheriff. 3. Appeal and error, § 1488*—when admission of incompetent evidence in trial by court is harmless error. Where trial was before the court without a jury, and competent and uncontradicted evidence supported the finding and judgment, it was not material error if other evidence not technically competent was heard.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 Ill. App. 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linn-v-moore-illappct-1917.