Linn v. Kay Corp.

199 A. 405, 123 N.J. Eq. 564, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 676

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided May 11, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trehchard, Parker, Case, Bodthe, Dohges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, Walker, JJ'. 13.

For reversal — Heher, Rafferty, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linn v. Kay Corp., 199 A. 405, 123 N.J. Eq. 564, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 676 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

199 A. 405 (Linn v. Kay Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.