Linn v. Jo-Ann Stores LLC

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedMarch 13, 2024
Docket2:23-cv-01035
StatusUnknown

This text of Linn v. Jo-Ann Stores LLC (Linn v. Jo-Ann Stores LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linn v. Jo-Ann Stores LLC, (W.D. Wash. 2024).

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 CARLA CASTILLO LINN, 8 Plaintiff, C23-1035 TSZ 9 v. MINUTE ORDER 10 JO-ANN STORES, LLC, 11 Defendant. 12 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable 13 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, docket no. 27, is DENIED. 14 Genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment. 15 (2) Although Defendant’s motion to strike, see Def.’s Reply at 10–15 (docket no. 43), portions of the Declaration of Joellen Gill, docket no. 34, was denied, see Minute 16 Order at ¶ 1 (docket no. 46), Defendant has raised issues concerning Gill’s anticipated testimony that must be addressed in advance of trial. The Court therefore treats 17 Defendant’s motion to strike as a motion to exclude portions of Joellen Gill’s opinion,1 and such motion is DENIED in part and DEFERRED in part as follows. 18 (a) Defendant argues that Gill improperly relies on five previously 19 undisclosed publications to support her opinions. Def.’s Reply at 14–15. 20 1 The deadline for filing motions related to expert testimony expired on February 22, 2024. See 21 Minute Order at ¶ 2 (docket no. 24). Although Defendant opted not to file a separate motion to exclude Gill’s testimony, the motion to strike that was imbedded in its reply brief was filed 22 before the deadline expired. 1 Defendant’s motion to exclude is DENIED in part as to this ground. Defendant will be permitted to depose Gill with respect to the five previously undisclosed 2 publications within twenty (20) days of the date of this Minute Order. The total time for such deposition is limited to three (3) hours. 3 (b) The Court DEFERS with respect to challenges to portions of Gill’s 4 opinion under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Plaintiff shall file a response with respect to this portion of Defendant’s 5 motion by March 22, 2024, and any reply is due by 9:00 a.m. on March 27, 2024. (3) The STAY of Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, docket 6 no. 35, Defendant’s motion to exclude Theodore Becker, docket no. 37, Defendant’s motion to exclude Brian Wicks, docket no. 41, and Plaintiff’s motion to exclude, docket 7 no. 47, is hereby LIFTED. Those motions are renoted to March 29, 2024. Responses are due on March 22, 2024, and any replies are due by 9:00 a.m. on March 27, 2024. 8 (4) The trial date and all other dates and deadlines set forth in the Minute Order 9 entered October 25, 2023, docket no. 24, shall remain in full force and effect. 10 (5) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record. 11 Dated this 13th day of March, 2024. 12 13 Ravi Subramanian Clerk 14 s/Laurie Cuaresma 15 Deputy Clerk 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Linn v. Jo-Ann Stores LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linn-v-jo-ann-stores-llc-wawd-2024.