Linkside at Baymeadows, Inc. v. Rowe
This text of 43 So. 3d 884 (Linkside at Baymeadows, Inc. v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Linkside at Baymeadows, Inc., timely filed this appeal seeking review of an order, entitled “Final Judgment,” that entered a money judgment on Count V of the Complaint and reserved jurisdiction “to dispose of any remaining issues regarding satisfaction of the Claim of Lien....” Steven and Janice Rowe filed a timely notice of cross-appeal seeking review of an earlier order that addressed Counts I-IV of the Complaint as well as the Counterclaim. Because these orders are not final, the appeal and cross-appeal are premature and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9. 110(J); Odham v. Mouat, 484 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Couch v. Tropical Breeze Resort Assn., Inc., 867 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Contrary to the appellees/cross-appellants’ assertion, the remaining issue is interrelated with the other issues in this case involving homeowner’s assessments and it is not merely attorney’s fees.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 So. 3d 884, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13608, 2010 WL 3465235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linkside-at-baymeadows-inc-v-rowe-fladistctapp-2010.