Linkosky, J. v. PennDOT

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 10, 2020·No. 10 WAL 2020 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

JOHN THOMAS LINKOSKY, : No. 10 WAL 2020 :

Respondent :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : :

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, : BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, :

:

Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Where Licensee’s operating privilege was suspended in the State of Ohio when he applied for a duplicate Pennsylvania camera card (driver’s license), did the Department of Transportation err in denying his application for the duplicate camera card in accordance with the requirements of 75 Pa.C.S. § 1503(a)(1)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linkosky, J. v. PennDOT, (Pa. 2020).

Linkosky, J. v. PennDOT (Linkosky, J. v. PennDOT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1503
Pennsylvania § 1503(a)(1)