Linkline v. Sbc California, Inc.

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;  INREACH INTERNET LLC; OM NETWORKS, dba Omsoft Technologies, Inc.; NITELOG, INC., dba Red Shift Internet Services, No. 05-56023 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.  D.C. No. CV-03-05265-SVW SBC CALIFORNIA, INC., fka Pacific ORDER Bell Telephone Company; PACIFIC BELL INTERNET SERVICES; SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants-Appellants.  On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed April 9, 2009

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 129 S. Ct. 1109 (2009), we vacate our prior opinion in LinkLine Communications, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 503 F.3d 876 (9th Cir. 2007) and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court decision,

4161 4162 LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS v. SBC CALIFORNIA including but not limited to, its consideration of proposed amendments to the complaint.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

REMANDED. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.