Linkline Communications, Inc. v. Sbc California, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Linkline Communications, Inc. v. Sbc California, Inc.

563 F.3d 853, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8235, 2009 WL 942385

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Linkline Communications, Inc. v. Sbc California, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 503 F.3d 876 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 9, 2009·No. 05-56023·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc., — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1109, 172 L.Ed.2d 836 (2009), we vacate our prior opinion in LinkLine Communications, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 503 F.3d 876 (9th Cir.2007) and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court decision, including but not limited to, its consideration of proposed amendments to the complaint.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc., — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1109, 172 L.Ed.2d 836 (2009), we vacate our prior opinion in LinkLine Communications, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 503 F.3d 876 (9th Cir.2007) and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court decision, including but not limited to, its consideration of proposed amendments to the complaint.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

REMANDED.

Linkline Communications, Inc. v. Sbc California, Inc., 563 F.3d 853, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8235, 2009 WL 942385 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

563 F.3d 853 (Linkline Communications, Inc. v. Sbc California, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related