Linker v. Herard
This text of 13 Misc. 2d 445 (Linker v. Herard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The final order and judgment 'should he affirmed, without costs. By her express agreement, the tenant was barred from asserting and obtaining an adjudication in the instant proceeding of the counterclaims pleaded (Amazon Management Corp. v. Paff, 166 Misc. 438; Stevens v. Nye, 283 App. Div. 666; 3 New York Law of Landlord and Tenant, § 1126; Taylor v. Creary, 5 A D 2d 876). Their dismissal was properly without prejudice to the tenant’s right to bring any other action or proceeding based thereon, if she be so advised (cf. Blumenauer v. Richelson, 219 App. Div. 462).
Concur — Pette, Hart and Browe, JJ.
Final order and judgment affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Misc. 2d 445, 180 N.Y.S.2d 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linker-v-herard-nyappterm-1958.