Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Link v. Hill

Link v. Hill

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 826
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Link v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Ohio St. 421 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1927·No. No. 20413·Published

Opinion

LOBINSON, J.

The implication that.an agreement to repay upon the sale of certain property is an agreement to repay within a reasonable time, without the sale of the property, does not obtain where the facts and circumstances relative to the entering into such agreement preclude the existence of any such intention on the part of the contracting parties at such time.

(Marshall, CJ., Allen, Kinkade and Matthias, JJ., concur. Day and Jones, JJ., dissent.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Link v. Hill, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 826 (Ohio 1927).

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 826 (Link v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.