Link Belt Machinery Co. v. Hughes

62 Ill. App. 318, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 436
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 11, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 Ill. App. 318 (Link Belt Machinery Co. v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Link Belt Machinery Co. v. Hughes, 62 Ill. App. 318, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 436 (Ill. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The amount which the receiver was ordered to pay to appellee, was only equal to the rent which had accrued upon the lease during the time the premises were held and occupied by the receiver.

That while a receiver continues to hold possession of premises leased to the party over whose estate the receivership is, he must pay rent therefor, is well established.

The charge for rent of premises held and occupied by the receiver is a part of the expense of administration. White v. More, Assignee, 54 Ill. App. 606; Spencer, Trustee, v. World’s Columbian Exposition, 58 Ill. App. 637; Smith v. Goodman, 149 Ill. 75; High on Receivers, Sec. 273; Webster v. Nichols, 104 Ill. 160; Gluck on Receivers, 273.

The decree of the Superior Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perrin & Smith Printing Co. v. Cook Hotel & Excursion Co.
93 S.W. 337 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Ill. App. 318, 1895 Ill. App. LEXIS 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/link-belt-machinery-co-v-hughes-illappct-1896.