Linick v. International Ry. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Linick v. International Ry. Co.

90 N.Y.S. 1104

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 21, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that it was error to exclude the evidence offered by the defendant for the purpose of proving, in effect, that plaintiff’s husband and witness attempted to induce the witness McNamara to promote and aid plaintiff’s claim. Schultz v. Third Ave. R. Co., 89 N. Y. 242: Nowack v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 166 N. Y. 433, 60 N. E. 32, 54 L. R. A. 592, 82 Am. St. Rep. 691; Gumby v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 65 App. Div. 38, 72 N. Y. Supp. 551; Lamb v. Lamb, 146 N. Y. 317, 41 N. E. 26.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that it was error to exclude the evidence offered by the defendant for the purpose of proving, in effect, that plaintiff’s husband and witness attempted to induce the witness McNamara to promote and aid plaintiff’s claim. Schultz v. Third Ave. R. Co., 89 N. Y. 242: Nowack v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 166 N. Y. 433, 60 N. E. 32, 54 L. R. A. 592, 82 Am. St. Rep. 691; Gumby v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 65 App. Div. 38, 72 N. Y. Supp. 551; Lamb v. Lamb, 146 N. Y. 317, 41 N. E. 26.

Linick v. International Ry. Co., 90 N.Y.S. 1104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

90 N.Y.S. 1104 (Linick v. International Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related