Linhart v. Buiff
This text of 11 Cal. 280 (Linhart v. Buiff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Terry, C. J., and Field, J., concurring.
This case, which Comes here on appeal from the judgment of the County Court of El Dorado, to which Court it had been taken from a judgment of a Justice of the Peace, must be dismissed, for want of jurisdiction. It does not appear, from the papers, that the value of the subject of the controversy, exclusive or inclusive of costs, was two hundred dollars. The amendment of the complaint in the Justice’s Court shows only that the plaintiff did not think the value of the claims was over two hundred dollars. But how much less than that sum, or what the real value, is not shown. But for this defect we should have felt compelled to reverse the judgment of the County Court, dismissing the proceeding for want of jurisdiction in the Justice. We think the Justice has the right to allow the complaint to be amended in all respects, so that the case may be determined on its substantial merits; and this, whether the defect be in the statement of jurisdictional or any other facts. The greatest liberality and indulgence should be extended in all such applications. .
But we cannot now remedy this error of the County Court.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Cal. 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linhart-v-buiff-cal-1858.