Linhares ex rel. Leite v. Tillinghast

30 F.2d 1013, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2302

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons sot forth in the opinion of the District Court, the decree of the District Court¹ is affirmed.

1 Brewster, J. This case presents precisely the same question presented in Keating ex rel. Antonio Mello et al. v. Tillinghast, Com’r, (D. C.) 24 F.(2d) 105, and is controlled by my decision in that case. Petition denied.