Linguanti v. Linguanti

96 So. 2d 906
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 3, 1957
DocketNo. 93
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 So. 2d 906 (Linguanti v. Linguanti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Linguanti v. Linguanti, 96 So. 2d 906 (Fla. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard, on the motion of Appellee to quash the appeal or affirm the judgment appealed from and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion to [907]*907affirm is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered and Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted and the judgment is

Affirmed.

KANNER, C. J., and PLEUS and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. v. Noel
254 So. 2d 7 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 2d 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linguanti-v-linguanti-fladistctapp-1957.