Lingquist v. O'Shea

Montana Supreme Court

Lingquist v. O'Shea

228 P. 1116, 67 Mont. 603

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 2, 1923

DocketNo. 5,284

StatusPublished

This text of 228 P. 1116 (Lingquist v. O'Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lingquist v. O'Shea, 228 P. 1116, 67 Mont. 603 (Mo. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

The motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled cause is sustained, for the reason that no undertaking on appeal was filed in the district court within five days after service of notice of appeal as provided by section 9733, Eevised Codes of 1921, and for the further reason that the transcript on appeal was not filed in this court within sixty days after the service of the notice of appeal, nor was the same filed prior to the motion to dismiss the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

The motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled cause is sustained, for the reason that no undertaking on appeal was filed in the district court within five days after service of notice of appeal as provided by section 9733, Eevised Codes of 1921, and for the further reason that the transcript on appeal was not filed in this court within sixty days after the service of the notice of appeal, nor was the same filed prior to the motion to dismiss the

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 P. 1116, 67 Mont. 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lingquist-v-oshea-mont-1923.