Lingo Const. v. Pritts Inc.
This text of 990 So. 2d 705 (Lingo Const. v. Pritts Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
LINGO CONSTRUCTION, Appellant,
v.
PRITTS INCORPORATED, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*706 Gary B. Goldman, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
Allen S. Kaufman of Allen S. Kaufman, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse an order dismissing for failure to prosecute. On the fifty-ninth day after a notice of lack of prosecution was issued by the clerk, plaintiff filed a motion to set a date for arbitration. The parties had previously agreed to submit the case to binding arbitration. Because plaintiff filed the motion to set arbitration within the sixty day period provided by rule 1.420(e), the court should have denied the motion to dismiss. Edwards v. City of St. Petersburg, 961 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Reversed.
KLEIN, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
990 So. 2d 705, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 14640, 2008 WL 4330260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lingo-const-v-pritts-inc-fladistctapp-2008.